SHAME: Vile Sharpton Show Lets Guest Compare Pro-Lifers to ‘Suicide Bombers’


On Saturday’s PoliticsNation present, MSNBC once more confirmed its hostility to pro-lifers when host Al Sharpton allowed a visitor to ridiculously liken opponents of abortion to “suicide bombers.” This is the complete quote: ” What it jogs my memory of fairly truthfully is a suicide bomber, somebody who looks like they’ve the proper and the ethical responsibility to mess up any person else’s life for the higher good.” 

This incendiary assault on pro-life advocates paradoxically got here throughout a phase that began off as a dialogue of the likelihood that there have been a number of blacks who’ve been lynched in Mississippi in latest many years.

After civil rights lawyer Jill Collen Jefferson mentioned her efforts to re-investigate a number of alleged suicides to find if they may have been murders, Sharpton turned consideration to Mississippi’s try to ban abortion after 15 weeks. Apparently unconcerned in regards to the giant variety of unborn black youngsters killed by abortion suppliers, Sharpton posed:

 

 

Legal professional Jefferson, as we speak about civil and human rights in Mississippi, I wish to point out the Supreme Court docket is about to listen to arguments a couple of at present blocked state legislation that would ban all abortions after 15 weeks. And so the closely poor, younger, and black girls who stand to lose entry to the one abortion clinic within the state sounds as a lot about civil rights as abortion rights to me. What are your ideas, counselor?

Jefferson started her response: “Sure, this can be a matter of civil rights. Having the proper to an abortion is a constitutional proper. It is grounded in the proper to privateness that’s inside the Structure. And I discover it actually fascinating that a part of this argument is an argument about, you already know, ‘the proper to an abortion isn’t explicitly listed within the Structure.'”

She then not solely claimed that there is no such thing as a “proper to bear arms” within the Structure though the Second Modification makes use of these exacts phrases, however she additionally smeared pro-lifers as being like murderers:

However you already know what? Neither is the proper to bear arms. That — the best way that we interpret that legislation is the interpretation of a constitutional provision, the Second Modification. On this, we’re decoding — we’re decoding one other constitutional provision, but we’re not making use of that very same logic to the scenario. What it jogs my memory of fairly truthfully is a suicide bomber, somebody who looks like they’ve the proper and the ethical responsibility to mess up any person else’s life for the higher good.

This vitriol from MSNBC was sponsored partly by RAM. Click on on the hyperlink to allow them to know what you suppose. 

Transcript follows. Click on “develop” to learn extra. 

MSNBC

PoliticsNation

August 28, 2021

5:48 p.m. Jap

AL SHARPTON: Legal professional Jefferson, as we speak about civil and human rights in Mississippi, I wish to point out the Supreme Court docket is about to listen to arguments a couple of at present blocked state legislation that would ban all abortions after 15 weeks. And so the closely poor, younger, and black girls who stand to lose entry to the one abortion clinic within the state sounds as a lot about civil rights as abortion rights to me. What are your ideas, counselor?

JILL COLLEN JEFFERSON, CIVIL RIGHTS ATTORNEY: Sure, this can be a matter of civil rights. Having the proper to an abortion is a constitutional proper. It is grounded in the proper to privateness that’s inside the Structure. And I discover it actually fascinating that a part of this argument is an argument about, you already know, “the proper to an abortion isn’t explicitly listed within the Structure.”

However you already know what? Neither is the proper to bear arms. That — the best way that we interpret that legislation is the interpretation of a constitutional provision, the Second Modification. On this, we’re decoding — we’re decoding one other constitutional provision, but we’re not making use of that very same logic to the scenario. What it jogs my memory of fairly truthfully is a suicide bomber, somebody who looks like they’ve the proper and the ethical responsibility to mess up any person else’s life for the higher good.

SHARPTON: Legal professional Jill Collen Jefferson, thanks for being with us tonight.



Supply hyperlink