Bonkers MSNBC: ‘Abundantly Clear’ Domestic Extremists Are ‘Gravest Threat,’ Not Al-Qaeda

[ad_1]

As President Biden epically fails in making an attempt to wash up his Afghanistan debacle, MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace has responded in sort by turning her present into state-run TV. Wallace spent a great deal of her present Thursday deflecting blame from the president and speaking about the rest in addition to Afghanistan. A person arrested outdoors the Library of Congress right this moment, ranting about Biden and falsely threatening to have a bomb in his automobile, offered Wallace with the a lot wanted fodder to worry that right-wing extremists have been “the gravest” nationwide safety menace this nation confronted.

After a report from Garrett Haake on the bomb menace, MSNBC contributor and former FBI Assistant Director for Counterintelligence Frank Figliuzzi warned Wallace that there was a “good storm” brewing of right-wing grievances (together with criticizing Biden’s Afghansistan pull-out) that might result in terrorism. Figliuzzi even claimed, “All of that is inflicting a type of on-line radicalization that, fairly frankly, I’ve not seen since my days working Al Qaeda/ISIS:”

FIGLIUZZI: t’s to amplify the DHS warning that tells us that there is a good storm of grievance and trigger creating on extremist websites of all types. What’s it? And now let’s add, by the way in which, let’s add to what I am about to record Afghanistan and a way that one thing went unsuitable there and one way or the other that is an injustice, maybe, to those that served there or not. However let’s rattle it off. The anti-mask, the anti-vaccine, the January sixth political prisoner notion, the notion that Ashli Babbitt is a few type of martyr for the trigger that must be avenged and now that Trump will come again and a rally goes to occur this weekend in Alabama. All of that is going to occur after which a significant rally that is been permitted already within the District of Columbia later in September, all of that is inflicting a type of on-line radicalization that, fairly frankly, I’ve not seen since my days working Al Qaeda/ISIS. It is the radicalization of violence, it is on-line, it is the will to be part of one thing better than your self and your willingness to behave out violently due to your beliefs. 

One other right-wing terrorism-inducing speaking level apparently was unlawful immigration. Wallace adopted up by attacking “right-wing media” as offering a “pipeline” to terrorism by speaking about unlawful immigrants on the border and connecting that to Afghan refugees:

However the different matter is plenty of complaints about undocumented immigrants, what’s being broadcast evening after evening on different networks as we cowl the withdrawal from Afghanistan. Fearmongering about refugee resettlement. It’s a pipeline to a complete lot of individuals that aren’t impressed to violence. However for he and she or he who’re impressed to violence, there’s a direct line from the disinformation and the fearmongering in right-wing media. 

However this merely isn’t true. 

A short time later, the MSNBC host complained to former Trump White Home aide-turned-MSNBC contributor Olivia Troye that Republicans weren’t taking the specter of [right-wing] home terrorism critically sufficient. She even claimed it was the “gravest terrorist menace,” proper now, not the Taliban or Al-Qaeda:

For the final seven days there’s been a reasonably intense debate occurring about whether or not the withdrawal from Afghanistan, which is undeniably chaotic, however whether or not the results of leaving round this 20th anniversary of 9/11, and seeing the Taliban take management of that nation, whether or not that places into movement the situations that led to Al Qaeda taking over store in 2001 there. It’s abundantly clear that the gravest home — the gravest terrorist menace is violent extremism, that is what DHS has been telegraphing for a lot of months now. An aggressive posture towards international terrorism and that menace has traditionally been bipartisan. The popularity of the specter of home violent extremism will not be even one thing that most individuals on the correct proper now on the nationwide stage may even say out loud. It does not even come out of their mouths. How can we achieve success within the combat in opposition to home violent terrorism if one of many two governing events does not acknowledge it and agree that we have to stomp it out? 

The 9/11 assaults have been the deadliest assaults on American soil, killing nearly 3,000 Individuals. One person–a Trump supporter– was killed on account of the January 6 riot. Just some months later in April, a left-wing extremist killed a Capitol Police Officer and that didn’t result in months and months of stories protection fretting over left-wing home threats. And will we even have to say the shameful excuses from the media over Antifa and BLM riots final Summer season leading to violence and deaths as effectively?

MSNBC deflecting blame from Biden was paid for by sponsor HughesNet, contact them on the Conservatives combat again web page right here

Learn transcript parts beneath:

Deadline: White Home

MSNBC

8/19/21

FRANK FIGLIUZZI: …What we’re seeing on this particular person’s social media already and the associates that I work with who’re on this and digging and scraping his social media, his postings, they’re telling me there’s a deep sense of trigger, as incoherent as it could be with this particular person there’s a trigger he thinks he belongs to, there’s a number of grievances he thinks he must air out. And why will we care about this? Why are we even speaking about it? As you mentioned, it is to not amplify him. It is to amplify the DHS warning that tells us that there is a good storm of grievance and trigger creating on extremist websites of all types. 

What’s it? And now let’s add, by the way in which, let’s add to what I am about to record Afghanistan and a way that one thing went unsuitable there and one way or the other that is an injustice, maybe, to those that served there or not. However let’s rattle it off. The anti-mask, the anti-vaccine, the January sixth political prisoner notion, the notion that Ashli Babbitt is a few type of martyr for the trigger that must be avenged and now that Trump will come again and a rally goes to occur this weekend in Alabama. All of that is going to occur after which a significant rally that is been permitted already within the District of Columbia later in September, all of that is inflicting a type of on-line radicalization that, fairly frankly, I’ve not seen since my days working Al Qaeda/ISIS. It is the radicalization of violence, its on-line, it is the will to be part of one thing better than your self and your willingness to behave out violently due to your beliefs. 

WALLACE:  Frank, let me simply comply with up, and I share the discomfort and the type of stress about amplification, however I believe that a few of that discomfort is how we’re right here, as a result of on the correct — , I wish to point out one different matter, and I am not going to play it. I watched it. I am not going to indicate it. However the different matter is plenty of complaints about undocumented immigrants, what’s being broadcast evening after evening on different networks as we cowl the withdrawal from Afghanistan. Fearmongering about refugee resettlement. It’s a pipeline to a complete lot of individuals that aren’t impressed to violence. However for he and she or he who’re impressed to violence, there’s a direct line from the disinformation and the fearmongering in right-wing media. 

FIGLIUZZI: Yeah, this notion, look, we have already seen it in postings, even from members of congress exhibiting the potential for refugees pouring out of Afghanistan, these individuals aren’t like us, would you like this aircraft touchdown in your yard. All of the fearmongering on high of the craziness that is already right here. And there are those that will say police cannot anticipate and management ought to by no means anticipate a loopy individual doing one thing like this all by himself that occurred right this moment. No–That is proper, besides that is not the place we’re at proper now. The craziness, the unhinged individuals, the individuals keen to commit violence have gotten massive sufficient and now not a fringe and now mainstreamed that we do have to fret about them and we do have to fret in regards to the subsequent one. So the FBI goes to dig deeply into this man’s background not simply to make a case in opposition to him, that is already made, however fairly frankly, to determine the place he received radicalized, who else is like him, who else is within the wings able to commit the type of violence that DHS is warning us about. 

NICOLLE WALLACE: Olivia, let me simply carry into this dialog the elephant within the room. For the final seven days there’s been a reasonably intense debate occurring about whether or not the withdrawal from Afghanistan, which is undeniably chaotic, however whether or not the results of leaving round this 20th anniversary of 9/11, and seeing the Taliban take management of that nation, whether or not that places into movement the situations that led to Al Qaeda taking over store in 2001 there. It’s abundantly clear that the gravest home — the gravest terrorist menace is violent extremism, that is what dhs has been telegraphing for a lot of months now. An aggressive posture towards international terrorism and that menace has traditionally been bipartisan. The popularity of the specter of home violent extremism will not be even one thing that most individuals on the correct proper now on the nationwide stage may even say out loud. It does not even come out of their mouths. How can we achieve success within the combat in opposition to home violent terrorism if one of many two governing events does not acknowledge it and agree that we have to stomp it out? 

OLIVIA TROYE: I believe you nailed it and I believe it makes this downside that rather more advanced and tougher for our homeland safety enterprise. The system is working, they put out that menace advisory. I am glad to see the system working and dhs can converse freely about these threats and name it for what it’s and what’s taking place. However I believe that we’re going to see ongoing challenges. We’re in a second of consequence proper now. And I will be seeking to see what these influencers, these leaders who’ve led plenty of this divisive rhetoric, who proceed to steer that divisive rhetoric proper now with their feedback about what’s taking place in Afghanistan and feedback on refugees and all of this nativism rhetoric that they proceed to push that creates divisiveness throughout our nation, it will likely be attention-grabbing to see their feedback on how they reply to this case, this menace on the capitol that when once more performed out right this moment. And whether or not he was a lone wolf actor or whether or not he’s a part of a community, I do assume we’re going to proceed to see incidents like this as a result of they’re being pushed by arratives on social media they usually’re seeing elected leaders converse this fashion and seeing it on networks it is a mixture of all the affect coming collectively and it is trigger for concern and I believe the person coming into city for what it seems like, the investigation will play out, however the pinnacle is attacking the U.S. Capitol and being anti-government and attacking a few of these leaders and naming plenty of the democratic leaders that proper now are in workplace. And the place is that being pushed from? It is being pushed by the narratives being pushed by the far proper and likewise irresponsible Republicans and the way in which they’re talking about others and issues that they are doing. 

 

JOHN HEILLMAN: But when Joe Biden can hold having the dialogue be a dialogue framed round, was it proper to depart Afghanistan or was it unsuitable, was it a mistake to depart Afghanistan, he’ll win that argument. The politics of this will not be going to be problematic for him in the long term, and he’ll be high quality as a result of that is a difficulty about which we already knew there was broad bipartisan help for leaving Afghanistan, for ending the battle. That was true — that was one of many explanation why Donald Trump and Joe Biden agree about this, that it was time to go. If they will have the talk past these phrases, this will probably be high quality for Joe Biden. And I simply — I believe the query is, over the course of the final week or so, I might say that is not been the phrases, a minimum of the media and the nationwide safety institution, as you say, Nicolle, the intelligence neighborhood, the nationwide safety institution, elected officers, not simply elected Republicans, however elected Democrats, a lot of whom you’ve got had in your air and we have seen throughout tv, individuals like Seth Bolden and different individuals particularly the veterans amongst them who’ve had a special dialog which have mentioned, sure, we agree that leaving Afghanistan was proper, and, sure, we agree this was the time to depart Afghanistan, however that this was a botched withdrawal and that there was pointless humanitarian and doubtlessly safety implications to the truth that this was not dealt with in addition to it could possibly be dealt with. Now, some individuals will say that that’s all, , high quality, however finally it is irrelevant in comparison with the bigger query, was it proper to depart or not…

 

[ad_2]

Supply hyperlink