Ariz AG Mark Brnovich: Democrats’ hypocritical election fights – forget fairness. Here’s what they really want



NEWNow you can hearken to Fox Information articles!

Final yr, within the midst of a pandemic, Democratic legal professionals and their political allies labored tirelessly throughout the nation to file election lawsuits and alter long-standing voting processes via edicts from the courts. The truth is, 2020 was probably the most litigated election in U.S. historical past.  

Within the battleground state of Arizona, the Democratic Social gathering and their politically aligned special-interest teams labored to bypass the rule of regulation and rework long-standing election procedures, claiming it was essential to make it simpler for folks to vote, whereas shamelessly throwing round charged phrases like “disenfranchisement” and “suppression.”  

Earlier this month, the Arizona Legal professional Basic’s Workplace defended one other commonsense Arizona election regulation on the Ninth Circuit in opposition to a authorized problem by the Democratic Nationwide Committee (DNC) and its allies. Filed throughout the center of the pandemic, this lawsuit pertains to unsigned mail-in ballots.  


Arizona regulation permits voters to signal their early mail-in ballots up till polls shut, however not after. The DNC has argued that this absence of a post-election “remedy” interval unconstitutionally “disenfranchises” voters. 

Arizona is among the many most beneficiant states with respect to each fixing mail-in ballots with lacking voter signatures and entry to voting typically. Of the 31 states that use signatures as the first technique of authenticating mail-in ballots, 15 don’t allow any curing in any respect. Arizona permits curing up till polls shut on Election Day, simply as Georgia, Michigan and Massachusetts do. 


This DNC lawsuit highlights the obtrusive hypocrisy of Democratic Social gathering management on election litigation. In case after case, their legal professionals argue that election legal guidelines in battleground states lead to unconstitutional “disenfranchisement” – a time period the DNC unsubtly references a whopping 31 occasions of their mail-in poll transient. 

Extra from Opinion

However on the similar time, Democrats politically management different states with the identical so-called “disenfranchising” legal guidelines. In the event that they consider such legal guidelines truly hurt voters, Democratic legislators may merely vote to vary their very own legal guidelines – no lawsuit wanted. The Democratic managed governments in these states seem to have a profoundly totally different view of the Structure in comparison with their legal professionals. 

If DNC legal professionals’ arguments are to be accepted, Democratic legislators and governors are engaged in rampant and pervasive nationwide voter disenfranchisement. None of those inconsistencies are a secret. However the mainstream media constantly refuses to give attention to these obtrusive contradictions, preferring as an alternative to uncritically parrot DNC speaking factors.   

For instance, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, New York, New Jersey and Virginia don’t allow any curing of lacking signatures by any means 

–not like Arizona, which allows curing till the polls shut on Election Day. The Democratic majorities may change these legal guidelines in a heartbeat, however steadfastly refuse to take action. Extra tellingly, the DNC has not sued a single one in all these states. 

If Democratic management had any disgrace, they might on the very least urge legislators to vote the best way that their legal professionals sue.

Equally, DNC’s legal professionals sued Arizona as a result of it requires mail-in ballots to be obtained by poll-closing, not merely post-marked by then. Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island and Virginia all have the very same deadline – and all have Democratic-controlled governments. However there are not any DNC lawsuits. 

Likewise, Arizona regulation imposes restrictions on third-party assortment of ballots, extra generally often called poll harvesting. DNC sued Arizona on this subject, and we lately prevailed in a 6-Three choice on the U.S. Supreme Courtroom in a landmark case I personally argued. However Connecticut, Nevada, New Mexico and Virginia all have equal legal guidelines, but no lawsuits. 

Lately, President Biden’s Division of Justice filed a lawsuit in opposition to Georgia for his or her newly enacted voting integrity laws. Biden known as the commonsense legal guidelines “Jim Crow on steroids” and “an atrocity.” Except for the truth that the laws truly will increase entry for voters, likening the laws to Jim Crow cheapens the accomplishments and sacrifices of Individuals who truly suffered beneath Jim Crow.  

The fact is that Biden’s dwelling state of Delaware has lots of the similar and even stricter voting legal guidelines than Georgia, permitting no in-person early voting and requiring voter ID. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., known as the Georgia regulation a “despicable voter suppression invoice.” However her dwelling state of Massachusetts has extra restrictive voting legal guidelines than Georgia. The hypocrisy is astounding.   


If Democratic management had any disgrace, they might on the very least urge legislators to vote the best way that their legal professionals sue. However don’t maintain your breath. The DNC and their activist allies have demonstrated that their view of voter “disenfranchisement” will not be an goal take a look at, however quite a rallying cry conveniently exploited for political acquire.  

Greater than seven months after the election, the authorized fights proceed. Within the meantime, I’ll hold defending Arizona election legal guidelines in opposition to DNC’s hypocritical and relentless partisan assaults on the integrity of our electoral course of. 



Supply hyperlink