Tesla CEO Elon Musk goes to trial Monday to defend $2.6 billion SolarCity acquisition



Elon Musk speaks at SolarCity’s Inside Power Summit in New York.

Rashid Umar Abbasi | Reuters

Tesla CEO Elon Musk is anticipated in courtroom on Monday, and the stakes are excessive — if he loses he might need to pay upwards of $2 billion from his appreciable private wealth.

Musk would be the first witness in a trial to defend his function in Tesla’s $2.6 billion acquisition of SolarCity. Shareholders have sued Musk and members of the Tesla board, alleging that the 2016 deal amounted to a SolarCity bailout.

Additionally they allege that it unfairly enriched the Musk household, who had been among the many largest shareholders, and that Musk and others didn’t disclose all pertinent particulars and breached their fiduciary tasks. Musk has insisted he was “absolutely recused” from negotiations over the deal. 

Final yr, the board members named within the go well with settled with the Tesla shareholders for $60 million with no admission of wrongdoing. Musk, the second-richest particular person on this planet, was the one defendant who selected to take the combat to courtroom.

There isn’t any jury to influence on this matter. His destiny can be decided by the Delaware Chancery Courtroom’s decide, Vice-Chancellor Joseph Slights III.

Days in courtroom

Musk has had his share of authorized issues past SolarCity.

For instance, the SEC sued him in 2018 for fraud, with Musk and Tesla settling, paying $20 million every. The fees got here after Musk tweeted about taking Tesla personal for $420 a share, a transfer that despatched Tesla’s inventory value hovering. Musk needed to quickly relinquish his chairman function at Tesla as one of many phrases of the settlement.

In a separate case, he emerged victorious after caving professional Vernon Unsworth stated Musk had defamed him when the Tesla CEO referred to as him a “pedo man” on twitter. His attorneys argued that “pedo man” was heated rhetoric and never meant as assertion of truth.

Tesla and Musk are going through many different lawsuits, together with one over Musk’s unprecedented CEO compensation bundle, and a variety of federal probes in keeping with the corporate’s personal monetary filings.

Within the SolarCity case, the decide must determine whether or not Musk was a conflicted controlling shareholder who met the “total equity” customary in his dealing with of the SolarCity acquisition.

In different phrases, was Musk performing in Tesla shareholders’ finest curiosity? And did Musk inform shareholders every part they deserved to know?

Often known as a shareholder spinoff motion, this sort of lawsuit is filed by traders on behalf of an organization, relatively than the people or funds themselves. If the plaintiffs win, proceeds could go to Tesla and to not the stakeholders who introduced the go well with.

Firm connections

Based on a submitting with the chancery courtroom, Musk owned 22.1% of Tesla frequent inventory on the time of the deal, and 21.9% of SolarCity. SolarCity was a troubled asset that was bleeding money within the capital-intensive market of residential photo voltaic deployment.

Autos sit parked exterior the Tesla Inc. photo voltaic panel manufacturing facility in Buffalo, New York, U.S., on Wednesday, Dec. 26, 2018.

Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Pictures

Musk’s attorneys are anticipated to argue that the SolarCity deal hasn’t harmed shareholders in any respect and that they voted overwhelmingly to approve the acquisition. In any case, Tesla shares have skyrocketed from a closing value of $43.92 on June 21, 2016 — when Tesla introduced it could bid for SolarCity — to a closing value of $656.95 on July 9, 2021 (Friday) after a five-for-one inventory cut up final yr.

The corporate can be a part of the S&P 500 now, and experiences income often.

SolarCity was based and run by Musk’s cousins, Lyndon and Peter Rive, however backed by Musk who served as chairman of the board. In the meantime, he additionally was CEO of Tesla, in addition to the corporate’s chairman.


That wasn’t his solely potential battle. SpaceX, Musk’s aerospace enterprise, had invested $255 million in SolarCity bonds from March 2015 to March 2016. 4 members of Tesla’s board straight or not directly owned SolarCity inventory on the time the acquisition was into consideration. And a few Tesla board members additionally held shares in SpaceX and had been on its board.

How he pitched it

To Musk and lots of of his supporters, the acquisition of SolarCity in 2016 represented a pure mixture of his corporations and a approach for Tesla to pursue its environmental mission with a broader array of merchandise. Householders would be capable of finance and set up photo voltaic rooftop panels from the identical firm that supplied their electrical automobile, dwelling charging station and backup battery for vitality storage.

Tesla had already launched an vitality division in late 2015, with a house battery dubbed the Powerwall and different large batteries to be used by companies and utilities.

By June 2016, Musk stated Tesla would bid $2.eight billion to purchase SolarCity. “I do not assume this creates extra monetary danger for Tesla,” he stated at the moment, and referred to as a merger “blindingly apparent.” However Tesla traders had been skeptical, with the inventory value plunging greater than 10% on the announcement. 

In July 2016, Musk introduced his imaginative and prescient of Tesla as an automotive innovator and renewable vitality titan in his well-known “Grasp Plan Half Deux.”

As CNBC beforehand reported, unsealed courtroom paperwork, together with emails between Musk and SolarCity execs, would later reveal that he knew SolarCity was going through a “liquidity disaster” whilst Tesla pursued the acquisition.

“Three issues must occur to vary investor sentiment: SolarCity fixing its liquidity disaster, an LOI with Panasonic to deal with photo voltaic cell manufacturing danger, and a joint product demo,” Musk wrote to SolarCity execs in September that yr. “Ought to be capable of do all these earlier than the shareholder vote.”

In October 2018, Tesla and SolarCity collectively introduced a mixed photo voltaic roof and battery pack. Musk confirmed off what regarded like a photo voltaic panel, miniaturized and smooth sufficient to be mistaken for high-end roofing supplies, on the Hollywood set of Determined Housewives. 

After the deal

The hype occasion did assist him to show investor sentiment. In November, the deal was accepted in a vote by 85% of shareholders. However after it closed, Tesla’s SolarCity enterprise would falter.

Via the years, the corporate repeatedly delayed mass manufacturing its Solarglass roof tiles. Those Musk introduced as a production-ready prototype in 2016 had been really a non-functional design prototype.

Walmart sued Tesla after fires broke out on panels the corporate had put in atop their amenities. A former Tesla Power worker filed a whistleblower grievance to federal companies in regards to the fireplace dangers of Tesla’s photo voltaic rooftops. And Panasonic exited from the Buffalo plant that Tesla took over, as soon as it was clear Tesla was not going to fabricate its photo voltaic roof tiles there.

Whereas the Tesla photo voltaic roof tiles haven’t taken off, the corporate’s vitality storage merchandise are on a tear, as demand for lower-cost electrical energy from renewable sources picks up worldwide.

Within the trial beginning Monday in Wilmington, Delaware, Musk can be represented by attorneys with Ross Aronstam & Moritz (David E. Ross, Garrett B. Moritz and Benjamin Z. Grossberg). The trial is anticipated to run till July 23, 2021, until the entities search a settlement earlier than it is performed.


Supply hyperlink